Justify This!

I dare you!

Stuff like this makes me mad. Really mad. Who are the ignorant scumbags (which is really quite insulting to actual bags filled with scum) who encourage this?!

Eating disorders (EDs) are life-threatening and should not be taken lightly. They should not be encouraged. However, there are some people who seem to insist on helping these kids kill themselves. Do they just hate girls? Are they actually AWARE of the behavior they're encouraging?

The site mentioned in the article I linked to, bluedragonfly.org, is the website of one such person. This site talks much of "reaching perfection," and names of the posters on the message board include "iwannawasteaway" and "stringbean." The message boards have 5'5 girls talking about their "goal weight," and longing for their weight to be back in double digits. In fact, one girl gave her "stats," and they were as follows:

Height: 5'9

Highest Weight: 135 (sadly that's at the low end of "normal" for my height...you think I just might have a problem?)

Lowest Weight: 95 (glory days, but kind of painful)

Current weight: 104.2 (after bouncing up to a wretched 120 this summer...don't know what happened there, blech!)

Goal Weight: good question...99? Pretty much to keep going down (of course we all know we'll never be satisfied so why have goal weights?)

It seems as though many of these girls know that what they're doing is unhealthy, but they claim to like the feeling of control they get when they haven't eaten in a long time. A website like bluedragonfly.org could be very beneficial for people like this. Unfortunately, it just festers.

I felt sick when I read the following exchange:

So far so good...only 100 cals i have eaten.5 hours left til bed time...I have to stay strong...food is my enemy.I think I am going to exerscise again around 8:30ish.How is everyone else's day going? Anyone struggeling out there like myself...IT SUCKS!!!!!!!!I wish I had a button so u could control your weight instead of food.How unrealistic do I sound...I'm having a hard time right now cuz I want some chocolate....Ok I am done rambiling on....-Kim

its that hard time of day i know im fasting and really hungary but i dont care food is the enemy.my parents are eating chineseright now im just smoking ciggs and staying away stay strong u can do it -disgusted

Here's another quote you might like (read: be appalled by):

"I've freed myself from this compulsion of eating. When I wake, I am empty, light, light-headed; I like to stay this way, free and pure, light on my feet, traveling light. For me, food's only interest lies in how little I need, how strong I am, how well I can resist-each time achieving another small victory of the will: one carrot instead of two, half a cracker, no more peas. Each gain makes me stronger, purer, larger in my exercise of power, until eventually I see no reason to eat at all"

So this is what our friendly little "support group" is perpetuating. Just reading through the message boards, I started to get hunger pains. Throughout the conversations, the girls can be seen talking about things like trying to stop purging. Unfortunately, the only advice they give each other is to simply not eat, as this eliminates the need to purge. Obviously, this support group does not support *anorexics*, it supports *anorexia*. And the lovely bluedragonfly is the one responsible for this board.

Now that we've seen what this site actually does, let's see what it claims to do.

I, nor this site, are trying to help anyone kill themselves. I have said before, will always believe, and always say whether I recover on not - Anorexia Nervosa is a mental disease that reflects an imperfection in the make up of your ability to process emotion and stimulus [yes, I made that up, it's not regurgitated pap-speak from some Cosmo, like haters use.]

Lots of pretty words, no substance whatsoever. Whether what you said was right, wrong, or pure psychobabble, your website can't back up your claims. If posters on your message board talk about their "goal weight" and speak about how "food is my enemy" without reproof, then your site is a failure. If you continue to justify your site, then you yourself are a failure.

Another quote from the site:

This site is for support: We pat each other on the backs for our successes [as they are successes to us] and hug each other for our failures. We support each other through the rough patches and demand that you take care of yourself when another is in danger.

Successes to you? Do you know what success is for an anorexic? Losing more weight. You're not helping anyone solve their problem by patting them on the back for an achievement that they were driven to by their problem! I thought you weren't here to help anyone kill themselves, and yet you're rewarding people for things that can KILL THEM, you stupid....

We have a way of being able to bare our souls to each other because we don't need to hide the most basic part of our mental makeup. It is a starting point: we all know where each other are coming from, we don't need to explain that, and we can trust each other more than anyone else in our worlds.

Wonderful that you can "bare your souls" to each other. Really, it's very nice, we all need to be able to do that once in a while. But the simple fact is that you're not fixing anything that way. If I'm a POW and I have my hands tied behind my back, it doesn't matter how many of my tied-up comrades I show my hands to; they can't help me. So what can we do? Generally it's a good idea to find someone who's not in the same hole you're in, and get them to give you a hand up.

Here's another excerpt:

It's a support group in the best sense of the phrase: You're not okay, and that's okay. You can come here and try to find a bit of comfort in knowing that you're not alone, won't be judged and no one is going to tell you to fix yourself. You'll do that on your own when you're ready. And we will support you in that decision as well.

A support group? This begs the question, WHAT THE CRAP ARE YOU SUPPORTING? "No one is going to tell you to fix yourself." I'm sick. Tell someone with a life-threatening problem that they don't have a problem, and the problem WON'T GET FIXED! It's not like you're supporting the dressing habits of someone who wears different clothes; you're telling someone who could KILL HERSELF that she doesn't have a problem!

No one is telling the anorexic girls that they're stupid; no one's judging them. My heart goes out to them! I have the utmost sympathy for them; they've been lied to by a culture that places sex appeal and a skewed view of perfection on an absurdly high pedastal.

Anorexia appears to be a complex problem. I've not studied it in great detail, but I don't believe there is one generic reason for it. Desire for attention, actual or imagined struggles with weight, peer pressure, or desire for control or "perfection" can all be factors in the onset and perpetuation of an eating disorder. It, in my opinion, is a serious problem that requires a serious solution, and merely grouping a bunch of people with this problem together on one message board will not help cure it. Selling bracelets to help people's problems become part of their identity will not help matters either.

Who does bluedragonfly think she's fooling? Anyone can see the intent of her site and others like it, because actions speak louder than words. Whatever deceitful crap the mission statement may spew, the results of this website are quite harmful, perpetuating the starvation of America's youth.

Can bluedragonfly and others like her see the blood on their hands? Do they understand that they're making things worse for a group of people with a dire health problem? May God have mercy on their souls.

Stick It To the Man

I had a good laugh when I read this:

You Rock My Wally World

How dare they be a large business; the HORROR!

Neo, Retro Style

Wow, the blogwars that have been going on in the blogosphere! Word is that the Daily Kos and Eschaton (leftist blogs) sent their readers to flood Powerline blog (right-wing) with hate mail and such. Let's investigate...

According to Powerline, it started when Daily Kos and Eschaton sent malicious visitors their way. After many hateful e-mails and even telephone calls, Hindrocket snapped. He sent some e-mails which apparently were... unhappy? A bit of bad language and some insults flew to a couple of hate-mailers, and they posted the responses on their blogs.

Unfortunately, one of the e-mails that Hindrocket responded to was not too offensive (though it was a bit shortsighted and made a big deal out of "Enquirer" fodder), and the sender of the e-mail received an angry reply. He posted Hindrocket's response on his blog (warning: language, and links on that page may lead to offensive material; I don't trust it), and suddenly Hindrocket doesn't look so good.

It ended with Hindrocket apologizing, and the blogosphere's back to semi-normality. So here's my take on it:

Kos and Eschaton should know better. So should Hindrocket. Once it got to the point that they were receiving hateful phone calls, it was obviously out of hand. Hindrocket, you shouldn't have snapped like that; Kos and Eschaton, keep your minions in line, and don't criticize someone for using the same tactics you use.

Is this how the liberals wage their culture war? Find someone and make them mad? Let's also not forget the Democratic rallies where people get arrested for vandalizing property and getting out of control. One can always point to the public socialist indoctrination camps (read: schools) which the libs use as a more covert form of culture warfare as well, or they can point to Michael Moore and Kitty Kelly, the less-than-covert liars whom the Democrats embrace.

Here lies a very important difference between Conservatives and Liberals here. When a Conservative gets unruly or lies, the overwhelming majority of Conservatives distance themselves from him, and he often apologizes (Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, and Hindrocket). When a Liberal gets unruly or lies, however, his actions are defended rabidly by the American Left (Farenheit 9-11, GOP Convention protests, and Kitty Kelly).

This is why so many people are turned off by the Democratic party. "The more extremist, the better," believes the DNC. Instead of distancing themselves from the comments of Dems who have gone off the deep end, the DNC enthusiastically jumps right in after them. Instead of staying mainstream, the Dems follow the fringe folks, and then call their new position "mainstream" (much to the dismay of mainstream America). Can this kind of deception be justified by excuse other than insanity or stupidity?

The recent blogwar was just a very small front in the ongoing culture war, but it highlights the absurdity of the Liberals' tactics. No, Hindrocket was not right for what he said; I can't justify it. I can, however, say that the senders of the hate mail were also out of line. Their misbehavior provoked Hindrocket's misbehavior, as is the case in so many cultural conflicts. And yet, the bottom line remains:

Conservatives: Watch what you say and practice what you preach.

Liberals: For Pete's sake, play by the rules. And a little less whining would be nice...

Bugs = Buzz?

This has to be the most ill-conceived notion I've heard of in a year.

Well, maybe not the MOST ill-conceived... Whoever re-elected John McCain must have been really out of it too...

Blogger Strikes Back

Now this is interesting; has anyone noticed the comments? I, for one, greatly appreciate the new format! It certainly helps to be able to read the previous comments when posting a new one! What's even better is that they now have a popup window for comments, similar to the ones you can get on, say, Worldmagblog.

I thought I'd try out the popup version of comments and see how it goes over. In a few days I'll switch back to the updated old version, and see how it works.

Ooh, one other thing; there is now no need for anonymous comments! There is now an option to add a name or pseudonym and a link to your web page without a Blogger account! I'm so happy!

Thank you Blogger!

A Noisy Gong

That's what we are without love. I ran across an article recently in my World Magazine, and I just had to post it... so here it is.

Strength, Courage, Love

A quote:

One principle of biblical exegesis is that a repeated statement is an emphasized statement. What then do we do with a phrase used at least eight times? Clearly, this is important stuff. But what does it mean to be strong and courageous?

To some it means confronting opponents of Christ on the street. Some activists say that in-your-face protests demonstrate true commitment, and those who speak within sanctuaries are wimps. They claim biblical warrant for yelling at people, "You're going to hell," because if they don't say it the heathen will never hear it. (As if gay newspapers haven't for years printed such comments in order to equate Christianity with hatred.)

"Told Ya So" Just Doesn't Suffice...

The least-surprising headline of the year: Hezbollah Accused of Cease-Fire Sabotage

No, REALLY?!?

How long before we're allowed to blow those terrorists (Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc.) to kingom come? They've never been anything but terrorists, and every time Israel retaliates, she is met with international scorn.

The terrorists' minds are made up: they want to die for Allah. For goodness' sake, somebody help 'em out!

The Things That Go Through My Head...

(at a drive-through)

"Hi, welcome to Blasphemy King. May I take your order?"

"Yes, I'd like one large Da Vinci Code, a side order of the Apocrypha, the Gospel of Thomas to drink, and some Theistic Evolution for dessert."

"Will that be all?"

"Yes."

"Your total is 30 pieces of silver; please drive around."

Let's Play Follow the Leader

And Virginia can be the leader.

Three cheers for Virginia, and let's all point and laugh at Lionell Sprewell!

"On Tuesday, he said the measure was an unconstitutional attack on young blacks that would force parents to take off work to accompany their children to court just for making a fashion statement."

Well guess what; if the kids don't dress in a socially unacceptable manner in the first place, then the parents don't have to take time off work.

And since when was provocative dress considered a valid fashion statement?

Furthermore, it's not an attack on blacks if it's directed at everyone. If the blacks choose to break the rule, that's their problem, not the legislators'.

Who elected this guy?

Europe's Wonderful Morals

Over at the Numchuckskills blog, I found a very interesting post...

Just one more reason Europe's opinion about our morals doesn't matter.

Since when was prostitution considered a valid profession? This is moral relativism at its finest. I'll take Conservatism, thank you.