Does Kerry Have ANYTHING on Bush?

Well, one of the few negative things that Kerry has been able to say about Bush that had not been conclusively and concretely disproven is that Bush allowed Osama bin Laden to escape, through irresponsible policies.

Now, General Tommy Franks, who was actually *over* the operation to capture bin Laden has spoken out in an attempt to bring the truth to light.

Now, since the economy really ISN'T in a recession, despite Kerry's frequent suggestions that it is (Remember, the growth we've had of late definitely does NOT constitute a recession. There WAS a recession which technically started during Clinton's presidency)...

And since Iraq really IS better off as a democracy...

And since the Afghan people really ARE voting and participating in democracy...

And since Kerry saw the SAME intelligence that Bush saw and drew the SAME conclusions from it...

And since Bush really WON'T bring back the draft (despite Kerry's amazingly desperate arguments to the contrary)...

And since Kerry can't do any better on foreign policy than Bush can(France and Germany won't help us EVEN IF Kerry were elected president)...

And since a coalition of THIRTY NATIONS does not constitute a unilateral effort...

And since we REALLY ARE safer if we attack those who wish us harm before they harm us...

And now, since Bush REALLY CAN'T be blamed for our failure to apprehend bin Laden as of yet...

HOW IS KERRY SUPERIOR TO BUSH?

Kerry has nothing on Bush, and he knows it. That's why he keeps having to flip-flop and lie his way through speeches and debates. Kerry has made many arguments about how Bush has driven our nation into the ground, yet reality continues to prove that Bush is actually doing a decent job as president *and* that Kerry can do nothing to top Bush!

And this isn't even taking into account Kerry's pitiful political record! After FRAGGING HIMSELF and getting a Purple Heart for it, he gets out of the military by virtue of having three purple hearts. Upon his departure from the military, goes before Congress and LIES about our soldiers! He aids in the demoralization of our military men, and he denounces his service. Flash forward a couple of decades, and Kerry is a Senator, flaunting the military service he so regretted! He's a Senator who is willing to vote to send our troops into battle, and then vote to DENY THEM PROPER FUNDING! He looks at intelligence that everyone sees, makes the same judgment from the intelligence that everyone else made, and then singles out one man (who only saw the same intelligence as he did) and accuses him of lying!

Really, do you think Bush just created the intelligence or something?

Now, to top off Kerry's illustrious record, he is officially a TRAITOR! He gave comfort and aid to the enemy during the Vietnam war by meeting with the Viet Cong! After all this, should Kerry actually be President, the COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF OUR ARMED FORCES? The man has long shown a horrible disdain for our armed forces, and that tells me that he should not be charged with the security of the US.

If Bush is doing a good job (and he is, according to common sense and everyday knowledge), and if Kerry has no hope of doing any better, and if Kerry's record actually shows that he would do a TERRIBLE job as president compared to Bush, why would anyone vote for Kerry?

Peace (through strength)
Neo